While the physical access control of commercial buildings has long been a subject of extensive discussion, their cybersecurity often remains a critically overlooked aspect. This oversight is increasingly perilous with the rapid proliferation of connected, smart buildings. This article delves into the inherent cybersecurity challenges confronting modern smart buildings and underscores why comprehensive visibility into every connected device is not just important, but absolutely essential.
Smart buildings harness the power of Internet of Things (IoT) devices to deliver enhanced security, operational efficiency, and environmental sustainability. From integrated access control and building management systems that dynamically adjust HVAC and lighting based on occupancy, to seamless visitor experiences from parking lot to destination floor, connectivity is at the heart of their intelligence.
Yet, this very convenience introduces significant security risks, particularly if these interconnected devices are not meticulously monitored and managed.
“Smart buildings are inherently vulnerable due to poorly secured IoT devices,” explain Luke Bencie, MD, and Sasha Hossain, Junior Research Associate, at Security Management International. They point to smart locks, cameras, and HVAC systems as prime examples, noting these technologies are often engineered for functionality over robust security. “Poor security practices, such as unchanged default passwords, represent another major downfall, creating inviting entry points for unauthorized access and opportunities to tamper with sensitive data.”
Salvatore D’Agostino, CEO of IDmachines, emphasizes the complexity of managing these diverse devices. “Managing devices throughout their lifecycle and how they authenticate to the network is critical. This spectrum ranges from low-powered sensors and smart lightbulbs to devices with full IP stacks. Current methods and policies are often misaligned, and even many IP devices rely on self-signed certificates and keys that are overly long-lived, poorly managed, and isolated from core IT infrastructure. Threats to authentication and key management, alongside the management of privileged users accessing these networks and devices, are paramount.”
Types of Attacks Threatening Smart Buildings
According to Bencie and Hossain, smart buildings commonly face ransomware attacks, Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, and unauthorized remote access. They cite a chilling 2016 incident where a DDoS attack on critical infrastructure plunged two buildings in Finland into two days of winter heat loss. More recently, in 2024, Omni Hotels fell victim to a cyberattack by the ‘Daixin gang,’ who threatened to leak customer records on the dark web, leading to widespread disruptions in Wi-Fi, keycard functionality, and check-in systems for guests.
Severe Consequences Extend Beyond the Digital Realm
When a building succumbs to a major cyberattack, the repercussions can be catastrophic. Beyond significant financial losses and irreparable brand damage, such incidents can tragically endanger tenants’ lives.
“A compromised building system could present both operational and physical dangers, potentially failing to respond to emergencies and putting lives at risk,” warn Bencie and Hossain. “Data breaches can have long-term impacts, with the leakage of personal information leading to exploitation for surveillance, blackmail, or ransom demands.”
Mixed-Use Properties: Amplified Vulnerabilities
Mixed-use properties, where multiple tenants inhabit the same structure, face even greater cybersecurity complexities. A breach in one area can trigger a devastating domino effect across the entire building.
“Mixed-use buildings present increased considerations, as one breach can ripple through to impact other offices or residents,” Bencie and Hossain elaborate. “Since building systems are often interconnected, breaches are rarely isolated. Once building data is accessed, an attacker can target personal data from multiple sources, as well as sensitive information like camera feeds and bank details. Poorly secured POS terminals or smart home environments within apartments can all serve as entry points, creating significant risks and opportunities for attackers.”
Defense and Visibility: The Cornerstones of Security
The vulnerabilities discussed above underscore an urgent need to robustly protect smart buildings from cyber threats. Crucially, operators must achieve complete visibility – understanding precisely what devices exist, where they are located, what functions they perform, and how they communicate. Such comprehensive visibility is the bedrock for accurate asset inventory, the identification of unauthorized or forgotten devices, and the detection of insecure legacy systems still operating online. Without this foundational visibility, operators are effectively blind to their network’s landscape, and as the cybersecurity adage goes, “you can’t protect what you can’t see.”
Unfortunately, a critical lack of visibility remains a significant impediment to securing smart buildings effectively.
“In the context of smart sensors and even physical access control systems, device monitoring often lacks the extensiveness seen in IT systems,” notes D’Agostino. “Enterprise IT systems typically implement highly granular Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems and Simple Network Monitoring Protocols (SNMP). While physical access control systems possess similar capabilities, they are not always integrated into security operations centers and dashboards. For intelligent sensors and low-powered devices, Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) could transmit information back to network and device monitoring systems, but this is not yet widely implemented.”
Despite these challenges, a growing array of solutions and best practices are emerging to empower smart building operators to gain essential visibility and fortify their cybersecurity posture. We will explore these in greater detail in an upcoming article.

